Monday, March 7, 2016

LAPD Denies Request for Lash Files

The Los Angeles Police Department denied a request for the release of files related to the case of Jeffrey Alan Lash submitted under the California Public Records Act. The deceased body of Lash was discovered by LAPD in a parked vehicle in Pacific Palisades, and a rather incredible story of weapons, cars, cash, CIA operatives and ET-human hybrids proceeded to unfold. LAPD indicated the denial was issued because the request sought "records that are either investigatory records or properly part of an investigative file," adding that such files are exempt from disclosure.

My request, submitted February 26 to the LAPD Discovery Section, stated in part:
I am requesting copies of files available for release related to the discovery of the body of Jeffrey Alan Lash. The corpse was discovered by police on or about July 17, 2015 in Pacific Palisades. Of particular interest are files depicting investigations and conclusions of circumstances surrounding the deceased, but all records and files related to the Lash case available for release are requested.

The LAPD response, received by email March 7, explained:
The Los Angeles Police Department is cognizant of its responsibilities under the Act. It recognizes the statutory scheme was enacted in order to maximize citizen access to the workings of government. The Act does not mandate disclosure of all documents within the government's possession. Rather, by specific exemption and reference to other statutes, the Act recognizes that there are boundaries where the public's right to access must be balanced against such weighty considerations as the right of privacy, a right of constitutional dimension under California Constitution, Article 1, Section 1. The law also exempts from disclosure records that are privileged or confidential or otherwise exempt under either express provisions of the Act or pursuant to applicable federal or state law, per California Government Code Sections 6254(b); 6254(c); 62540; 6254(k); and 6255. 
Your request seeks records that are either investigatory records or properly part of an investigative file. In accordance with Section 62540, records of investigations conducted by, or investigatory files compiled by, any local police agency for law enforcement purposes, are exempt from disclosure. Therefore, I am denying your request.

I suspect there may be ongoing aspects of the investigation which would contribute to the decision to retain all files. Perhaps submitting the request again at a later date would be more productive, or making similar requests to additional agencies under the Freedom of Information Act would eventually reveal more information. 

Researchers wishing to email information requests to LAPD may do so at discovery@lapd.lacity.org, and the Discovery Section may be reached by telephone at 213-978-2100. Read more about the California Public Records Act on the LAPD website.     

6 comments:

  1. THEY KEPT MY 25 BUCKS.DID THEY KEEP YOURS TOO?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The case is now only 8 months old. It's probably still open. I wouldn't expect any police department to release to the public files on a case that wasn't closed. But heck, it was worth a shot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I thought so too. The local PD seems like the obvious place to start before filing requests to intel agencies. Also, a request itself appears to sometimes keep the process of releasing info in motion when detectives might become more involved in other cases and responsibilities (see second paragraph):

      http://www.examiner.com/article/police-detective-evidence-not-consistent-of-a-fight-romanek-assault-case

      Delete
  3. This case bears some startling similarities to the Las Vegas Route 91/Mandalay Bay/Stephen Paddock case ,would one agree ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can understand why it would come to mind, yes.

      Delete