Long
time UFO investigator Gary Hart commented tonight at The UFO Trail on
the infamous Carpenter Affair. The series of events involved the betrayal of
some 140 individuals who sought the support and services of John
Carpenter and the Mutual UFO Network during the 1990's. The 140, including Leah Haley,
underwent regressive hypnosis facilitated by Carpenter, a former
MUFON director of abduction research. It was later learned Carpenter
received some $14,000 in funding from Robert Bigelow in exchange for
ongoing activities and providing him and his associates, which
included Colonel John Alexander, with the case files of the 140. This
was done entirely without the knowledge or consent of the 140 individuals. Much more about
the Carpenter Affair can be read in the previous posts on the Leah
Haley case, including The Leah Haley Case: John Carpenter, where
Mr. Hart left the following comments:
Jack, as one of the principle reporters of the Carpenter Affair I found your posts quite interesting, especially in regards to what Mr. Carpenter had to say about everything. Perhaps I can clear up some few points that Mr. Carpenter chooses to repeatedly ignore or twist to a brighter point of view:
1) Mr. Carpenter originally wrote the section on handling abductee cases in the then current edition of the MUFON Field Investigator's Manual where he includes a sample form for the abductee to be presented with and sign if they wish to give a researcher permission to use their case material publicly. Mr. Carpenter, in a private communication, admitted that he had never had any of the abductees he worked with sign this or any other form of consent to sell or otherwise distribute their hypnosis files and that no researcher he knew followed his own suggested procedure.
Some files such as Leah Haley's would have been instantly identifiable even if Carpenter sold them without providing Mr. Bigelow with the identity of the person associated with each file. As I found out and was provided evidence of, Mr. Carpenter provided Mr. Bigelow with a name/case key list and even though every abductee I spoke with said that Carpenter promised he WOULD revisit them for their explicit permission to release any of their file materials if necessary yet he never did.
2) I brought the Carpenter case to public attention only after many of the abductees asked me to do so understanding that at that time he planned to write a book about them and was ALREADY selling a video for his personal profit that showed clips from some of their private hypnosis sessions with his professional credentials prominently listed on the videotape's cover.
3) Carpenter claimed, in a legal statement through his lawyer, that he did his hypnosis sessions as an amateur and thus could not be held to professional ethical standards - a point also made to me directly by then head of MUFON Walt Andrus. In fact, several of Carpenter's cases were referrals from other medical doctors. LCSW, by the way, is a professional designation - MO state Licensed Clinical Social Worker. MSW says that he has a masters in social work. All abductees I spoke with were shown only Carpenter's professional business card with these important licensing initials, not MUFON's more ordinary Investigator's ID card so he was promoting himself as a true health care professional.
4) Carpenter got to a point in the mid 90's where he double billed abductees: he asked them for personal payment for their hypnosis sessions and billed their insurance and there is proof of this.
5) Finally, as a result of my filing a complaint against Carpenter's professional license because of his unethical handling of abductee cases, he was put on 5 years probation by the State of Missouri and there is online proof of this also so the state did agree with the case we collectively presented to their investigative board.
MUFON still throws out the "we want to stop the backbiting and infighting in Ufology" line as if there never has been a legitimate legal issue with how MUFON board members and representatives (as John was as their then Director of Abduction Research). This was the case MUFON still would like to forget. This is the case that caused MUFON's Board in 2001 to vote and throw out the "member" designation so that from then on persons affiliated with MUFON would be "subscribers" only and have no voting rights as to how the organization does business.
Just to set things straight,
Gary Hart
REVISION
ReplyDeleteI read John Carpenter's comment regarding this issue. He makes very good points in his defense HOWEVER if you go to the Missouri Division of Professional Registration (http://pr.mo.gov/) you will see that he was on probation for five years from 2001 through 2006.
(https://renew.pr.mo.gov/licensee-search-detail.asp?passkey=1549455) Why put him on probation if he did nothing improper? I think this proves the accusations.
Hello, B. Becker, and thank you for the comments and link. As Mr. Hart suggested, it would indeed appear a reasonable case was made to the State of Missouri to result in the 5-year probation period.
DeleteYou or other readers might also choose to review such posts here on 'The UFO Trail' as 'The Leah Haley Case: The Eglin Expedition' ( http://ufotrail.blogspot.com/2012/02/leah-haley-case-eglin-expedition.html ), which states:
"In a July 20, 2000, email to UFO Updates List ( http://ufoupdateslist.com/2000/jul/m20-015.shtml ) and referring to the Carpenter Affair, John Velez explained, 'This nasty business has now been confirmed by Bigelow himself, Walt Andrus, Dr. Alexander of NIDS, and about seven of the abductees whose files were sold.'"
Thank you again for your comments and interest. You - or others - are encouraged to contact me directly at brewer.jack at rocketmail.com with information, reports and similar such data related to the Carpenter Affair. I am most interested in the chain of events and would highly appreciate correspondence with key individuals who desire to express their perspectives and those with verifiable information they wish to contribute.