tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post5945807701590976562..comments2024-02-26T03:03:24.947-05:00Comments on The UFO Trail: News of NoteJack Brewerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05778028283888927074noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-17152727139701688972017-02-24T19:54:14.901-05:002017-02-24T19:54:14.901-05:00Thanks, erickson. I see Sam Lounsberry of the Love...Thanks, erickson. I see Sam Lounsberry of the Loveland Reporter-Herald was tweeting the Romanek situation:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/samlounz/status/835252692909973504 <br /><br />https://twitter.com/samlounz/status/835252902700666880<br /><br />I imagine he'll publish a story later.Jack Brewerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05778028283888927074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-30861821250896496332017-02-24T19:50:13.327-05:002017-02-24T19:50:13.327-05:00Anonymous wrote: "How does discussing somethi...Anonymous wrote: "How does discussing something like "exploitation in ufology" work Jack? Based on your articles and book you haven't even proven that such a thing is occurring?"<br /><br />That ones easy. Go check out Paranormal Waypoint on KGRA Radio. There's courtroom admissible evidence in Jeff Ritzmann's show by way of audio recordings. <br /><br />All the best,<br /><br />Lorin <br /><br />https://emmawoodsfiles.com/home-4/shows/paranormal-waypoint-show/Lorin Cuttshttp://www.highstrangenessshow.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-9839902749254972962017-02-24T18:20:44.871-05:002017-02-24T18:20:44.871-05:00With the Romanek trial continued until July 31, I ...With the Romanek trial continued until July 31, I am glad (once again) that I did not make travel plans. Apparently, the court wondered why the defense intends to call 30 witness. While the list of potential witnesses is often very broad, it is a good question. Ericksonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13489446146745522101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-23826098311227663442017-02-23T14:27:11.420-05:002017-02-23T14:27:11.420-05:00Anon, see my three-part comment on this blog (link...Anon, see my three-part comment on this blog (link below) for examples of ufologists exposing the fraud and exploitation by other ufologists.<br /><br />http://ufotrail.blogspot.ca/2016/02/the-singers-hybrid-daughter-part-i.htmlTerry the Censorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07442516952399215568noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-8335185518914520222017-02-23T10:13:29.297-05:002017-02-23T10:13:29.297-05:00I was not going to reply to anonymous, but it seem...I was not going to reply to anonymous, but it seems to me that certain "researchers" do a great job of showing how exploitation in ufology works. The information that Jack provides speaks for itself.<br /><br />Speaking of such researchers, it might be an interesting year for courtroom drama. In addition to the Romanek trial, Sean and Melissa Morton, are currently set for trial for April, 2017. <br /><br />Sean has long been a fixture in the UFO / psychic / pseudolaw spheres (among others), but thus far his legal battles do not seem to have worked out well for him. His lost infamous suit against ufowatchdog. He is under a multimillion dollar SEC judgment. And in February, 2016, the Mortons were arrested for 56 counts of filing false income taxes, as they stepped off a cruise boat where Sean had been presenting.<br /><br />Sean has been representing himself and has filed a number of pleadings that could be described as either gibberish or "interesting." In January, the district court refused a request to continue the trial, but I would be surprised if the April date holds. Ericksonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13489446146745522101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-38081059940730100752017-02-21T00:55:19.593-05:002017-02-21T00:55:19.593-05:00How does discussing something like "exploitat...How does discussing something like "exploitation in ufology" work Jack? Based on your articles and book you haven't even proven that such a thing is occurring? Does that even matter to you? That you're essentially championing unsubstantiated claims from bitter individuals on smear campaigns. Your commitment to slandering and libelling researchers is really something else.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com