tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post479659597680089726..comments2024-02-26T03:03:24.947-05:00Comments on The UFO Trail: Those Mysterious Men and Their Flying MachinesJack Brewerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05778028283888927074noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-67027908121738522122019-05-28T20:30:13.424-04:002019-05-28T20:30:13.424-04:00Yes we are capable of building something that size...Yes we are capable of building something that size.<br />The Hindenburg was 245 m long, a football field is only 109 meters long. Take 3 Hindenburg type air-frames and join them nose to tail and thats one very large flying triangle.<br /><br />Some nice size comparison pics here<br /><br />https://www.airships.net/hindenburg/size-speed/<br /><br />I support the ET'sH hypothesis personally (multiple species of ET, an important distinction to the ETH label imo)<br /><br />But to the question could we build something this size, the answer has to be a yes.Mikenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-48150751868675951062013-10-15T22:06:14.852-04:002013-10-15T22:06:14.852-04:00Thanks, Jack. I would of course echo that thought,...Thanks, Jack. I would of course echo that thought, as it reflects what I said earlier on my own blog. With respect to the football field size, I'd say we *can* do that. The triangle dirigible in the pictures (the fat blue one) are a good 30-40 yards long. I see no reason we couldn't double that size. We have blimps at that scale - this just requires changing the shape to a triangle. You'd just need a facility to contain them - which of course we have in the modern aerospace industry. But again, no one is claiming that such technology explains every sighting. That would be claiming omniscience. I have a pretty secure grasp on my own lack of omniscience. Having said that, it's telling how many ETH proponents presume that ET is behind such sightings - and some presume basically all of them to read their material.mheiserhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16901534221867901256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-8947327620288254872013-07-21T12:44:06.860-04:002013-07-21T12:44:06.860-04:00Hi, HeyJude1965, and thanks for your comments. Whi...Hi, HeyJude1965, and thanks for your comments. While I of course do not speak for Dr. Heiser, I interpret he emphasized that he was not attempting to provide explanations for all reported triangle sightings, but wanted to make a certain point. <br /><br />That point being that information about patented dirigibles, some of which were triangular in shape and dating back over 100 years, relevant declassified aircraft and similar such circumstances deserve inclusion in a serious review of the topic. I further interpret that Heiser suggested such info was largely ignored by Colonel Alexander during the foreword he authored for Marler's book, as well as omitted from mention by Marler. I think Dr. Heiser was suggesting that, while he overall recommended Marler's book, a thorough and informed discussion should include such circumstances. Jack Brewerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05778028283888927074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8297935984616304783.post-72552136991144830272013-07-21T01:34:13.269-04:002013-07-21T01:34:13.269-04:00These STILL do not answer the questions to the lar...These STILL do not answer the questions to the large Triangle shaped craft seen by many. Credible eyewitnesses include several police officers from Illinois. Are we capable of building something 2 stories tall and as long as a football field? I wonder!HeyJude1965https://www.blogger.com/profile/08685557235018776658noreply@blogger.com